Reply to Victory Boyd

Your words deeply humble me. The Noah comparison is an honor I hope to grow into.

You're right that I find myself in a unique position. I am in a position where I could facilitate peace conversations between the presidents of US and China. I’m in a unique position where I am regularly asked to weigh in at White House summits, and advise leaders in Rome and Beijing on the future. Yet I'm not a physicist or chemist or housing builder, just a software engineer who's learned to speak truth when asked.

Here's what I've discovered: living in the future as you call it means carrying a particular burden. When you see that our education system is failing millions of kids, you must say so - even knowing that such critiques and reforms (perhaps better called revolutions) will affect real teachers feeding their families. When you understand that entire industries are coasting while infrastructure crumbles and while we have failed entire generations, you must advocate for disruption - even knowing it creates enemies and causes job loss.

I've been punished many times by so—called innovators who prefer status over truth, who want the badge of innovation without carrying the cross of being a disruptor. But I am happy to be the scapegoat if it means I can help usher in changes that bring pain now, as a substitute for devastating destruction later.

Your understanding of why I coined Christofuturism gives me hope. We need people like you who see that we can embrace technology's potential without worshipping it, keeping the proper hierarchy: God → Human → AI. Never twisted.

I care deeply about world peace and our kids waking up excited to learn and build the future. We're far from that vision, but we don't have to be. It just takes courage, wise action, and most importantly, deep faith and surrender to God.

Thank you for diving deep into my mission and for your encouragement. It means more than you know.

Grateful to have met you. Also, I plan to visit Dallas this week. Will you be around?